PDF In the Constitutional Court of South Africa

An interpretation of the Proviso is therefore contended for which has the effect that from the first moment in time when the Property fell within the area of a transitional

Engen submitted that Rissik Street did not complain to the Controller in terms of section 12B of the PPA that the termination of the operating lease was an unfair or unreasonable

[57] The High Court held that the matter pertained to the lawfulness and validity of the referral, an issue that falls within the purview of section 622a of the Competition Act.38 The

The Issues to be Argued: 1 Whether the claim for wages for the period 23 April 2007 to 18 September 2009 is based on a judgment debt; 2 Whether the claim for wages for the period

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case N°: 97/15655 £\ Case N°: CCT 33/97 In the matter between: MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING AND LOCAL

In that judgement Froneman J said, inter alia, the following: [30] The constitutional imperative of transparency in the process cuts both ways: not only is the general public entitled

This aspect namely whether or not the review was PAJA review or a legality review will comprehensively be dealt with in the written argument filed on behalf of the Applicant as

PLEASE NOTE FURTHER that this application is supported by the affidavit by M du Preez, with annexures thereto, attached hereto with the following annexures thereto: 1 The judgment in